You are hereForums / By Discipline / Mountain (off road) / By Location / Australia / NSW / NSW Trail Advocacy / Writing letters to politicians and newspapers

Writing letters to politicians and newspapers


hawkeye's picture

By hawkeye - Posted on 10 May 2012

Hi All, just wanted to broach a little issue that came up today when talking to The Manly Daily about our recent brouhaha with Rosemary Loughnane and the other NIMBYs, and to make some suggestions.

It appears that at least one person has taken the sample letter that I posted regarding the MD article and copy-pasted it to their email client and sent it off.

While I'm flattered that you think it was so good Sticking out tongue - and I and everyone else definitely appreciates your support Smiling - some thought needs to be applied to how doing that might be received.

Firstly, the journalist was confused about who the letter should actually be attributed to. While getting the credit doesn't bother me (and it's actually preferable that I'm not the only voice heard on this subject so that I don't sound like a party of one) it does to some degree diminish the power of the letter from both the original person and the others who send it.

Secondly, rather than being a grassroots campaign, it starts looking centrally coordinated. That is not so good.

My intent in putting up what I've sent is twofold: provide some inspiration by showing you "how to", and give you a hit list of issues and facts to talk about so that we're not contradicting each other.

I don't have a monopoly on insight, and there will be things that I miss that will have occurred to you, so if I may I'd like to strongly encouage you to take a moment or two to think about what's important to you in the matter, and use your own words.

It doesn't need to cover every issue I've covered. My letters are prone to being much too long anyway. Short and punchy is better than longwinded and boring. What you leave out, others will cover.

And because it is your unique voice that is being heard and not just a passive echo of mine, the choir is so much more powerful Smiling Thanks for all your contributions so far.

We still have a ways to go, but one thing I am sure about is we are not giving up and if nothing else we will outlast them. Evil

moggio's picture

Very true point.

We saw the problem with our lobbying up in the mountains. Anything the same or of a form letter style was pretty much dismissed. It seems the best is lots of short responses supporting the proposal with maybe one personal reason why.

The a few serious letters as well that actually outline the facts. I usually tried to approach from a different perspective just to make things a little different and also did them as a letter rather than an email (yeah old school with address and all)

The other thing that is the worst style was outrage and any insulting nature. Our opposition started getting irate as they seemed to be losing the battle and started getting irate and bitter in their letters. This never works well with a councillor. You really need to be polite and respectful at all times.

crank's picture

It might be better in the future to post dot points that need to be addressed, or have been addressed in a letter someone has already written; instead of posting up a completed letter. Explain that each point needs to be expanded upon by individuals or left out of their letters. Some people will still copy and paste the dot points but at least it's easy to see the copied ones for what they are.

Flynny's picture

A councilor once told me that when they get a bunch of letters/emails on the same subject if the first paragraph is the same as the letter before they just assume the rest is copy and pasted and put it on the read pile.

The tip therefore is to rewrite the letter that inspired you in your own words, starting with some personal view point.

BIGnige's picture

So are the MD going to print anything Hawkeye?

hawkeye's picture

http://manly-daily.whereilive.com.au/news/story/...

MOUNTAIN bike riders have hit back at claims that building new trails in Garigal National Park would damage the bushland and Aboriginal sites.

Comments have flooded in after a Manly Daily article featured Forestville resident Rosemary Loughnane’s concerns that a new trail would damage bushland and was insensitive to the area’s Aboriginal heritage. Read the story and comments

She collected the signatures of more than 540 people on a petition against the proposal.

Have your say on the issue by commenting below.

But Dee Why’s Simon Kean, president of TrailCare, said her comments were “misinformed, emotive and inflammatory”.

“If managed properly and with a proper trail design, erosion will not be an issue,” Mr Kean said.

“The track will actually resolve some issues such as the commuter route that runs over Aboriginal carvings.”

Mr Kean is part of an advisory committee consulting with the state government on the possible 10km trail. Three options are being considered.

He said bike user group numbers were on par with walkers but they only had 1 per cent of the available area to ride, compared with the number of official routes for bushwalkers.

The only authorised single bike track in the Warringah area is at Manly Dam and Mr Kean said reports of conflicts between walkers and bike riders were exaggerated.

“There are about 100,000 riders a year who use Manly Dam and there has been maybe one reported incident.”

He said the development of the trail was not intended to attract bike races but any proposed events would go through the proper process.

There were also no studies to suggest that night riding would disrupt nocturnal animals.

“The government is going through the review of environmental factors so we are going through due process,” he said.

hawkeye's picture

So it looks like my letter was missed and you guys with the short punchy sound bites were included. Smiling Well done, all.

Rosemary Loughnane was the first to respond, starting with:

Sustainability and mountain biking is a contraduction in terms! ...

I've responded with (still awaiting moderator approval):

Mountain bikers would be the first to agree that there are issues at Red Hill, Morgan Road Oxford Falls and Deep Creek.

The situation in all these locations highlights the urgent need for formal trail management plans and the adoption of sustainability standards.

These trails are almost all old vehicle tracks, some dating back to WWII and most of the damage we see relates to water flow and uncontrolled motorcycle use.

TrailCare again extends the invitation made to you in October last year to work through the issues and explain how the application of IMBA standards will help resolve them sustainably.

Again, hit the bullet points in your own words. Please resist the temptation to copy/paste.

Someone might like to mention the poor state and unsustainable nature of the walking tracks she and her colleagues use, again due to water flow issues caused by trails running down the fall line. Application of IMBA standards will help make these tracks both sustainable and less obtrusive in the environment in one swoop.

Isildur's picture

Nice looking article. Looks like Rosemary has already had a go though! She's already posted a comment, and by the looks of her comment she doesn't understand the difference between Freeriding & XC. Fair enough though, as most people don't know the nuances of the differing styles of MTB.

Am about to post a reply to hers, I suggest people who read it comment as well.

cambowambo's picture

FWIW I suggest that you consider the option of ignoring Rosemary Loughnane after just one succinct rebuttal.

Every time you comment you invite her response, which will be printed, inviting your side to respond again.

This is what papers such as the Manly Daily encourage as it gives them the illusion of being active members of the community rather than just large expanses of advertising and cross promotions of their other media interests (TV and Sport and etc.).

Believe me they have a track record and they will recycle arguments on an approximately 4-6 month rotation (see "road bikes should be banned" "drunk drivers" etc.).

But if you just ignore it they have to move on to another subject.

moggio's picture

Agreed, Rosemary is only as big as her opposition makes her. If she is ignored she is just a noisy person yelling in a vacuum.

Hawkeye's reply is enough.

It also raises the really good point that really pisses me off that the sustainability of walking tracks is always ignored because of the plain and simple bigotry against mountain bikes. Walkers are somehow sanctified.

Winco's picture

I had to say something too. But maybe some of the suggestions others have stated about 'feeding the flame' are relevant.

@Rosemary Loughnane

So Rosemary, why is it then when I regularly ride in national parks & state forests, both during the day and the night, do I regularly see the many native flora and fauna that you make mention of? They all appear to live/exist quite content with walkers, horse riders & mountain bikers using the same space. It appears these parks & forests indeed do successfully sustain native flora & fauna after all despite these activities taking place.

I think this, Rosemary, has nothing to do with native flora & fauna and more to do with your own personal prejudices against a section of your community. None of your objections stack up factually. Other communities have successfully managed to incorporate MTB bike & walking trails/tracks in their parks & forests that are properly designed, built, signposted & maintained without negatively impacting on the resident flora and fauna. So why is it you believe this cannot be achieved in Garigal NP? Instead of objecting Rosemary, may I suggest you can contribute by being the guardian, working with all the relevant stakeholders to ensure these MTB trails are built to the highest standards currently available to us.

Terra's picture

It's a good idea not to address the agitator directly at all.
In a twisted way it only gives false credit by keeping the agitators name in print.

If the agitator was standing for a good honest cause it would make sense but that person is being extremely dishonest.
The agitator is trying to inflame peaceful relations between friendly, co-operative groups such as mountain bikers, indigenous people (and walkers) by misrepresenting the truth.

That type of behaviour is the lowest of the low.

It's sad that a grown person will act like that and seek to ruin good relations between others simply because it suits their selfish ends in getting their own petty way.

People like that often get-off on seeing their name in print. Again, good idea not to address the agitator directly at all.

Best to redirect the focus and simply to speak positively about your real life enjoyment of mountainbiking, mentioning those things we love about it such as: "safe, sustainable, family focused, healthy, quiet, inclusive etc"
Represent yourself truthfully as a, "nature loving, courteous, caring, honest, money spending" enthusiast of the positive pastime of mountain biking.

The agitator is totally off the mark trying to label professionals, doctors, lawyers, business owners, whole families etc as some band of uncaring "extreme sport hoons". This will be obvious to the officials and the press if we stick together and tell our positive story.
But do go and have your say in cool clean, positive language. Representing the majority of the community.

Oh, and now is the best time to join Trailcare as a payed member... $10 is nothing if it helps ensure continued access to the trails you love.
Do it before the weekend finishes... Do it now!
http://www.trailcare.com.au/paid-members

(I have no connection to Trailcare other than being a paid member and supporting their efforts to maintain riding trail access).

Dicko's picture

I agree. with terra with regard to Trail care -.

Rosmary has 540 signatures - do we have 540 paid trailcare members ? Maybe we do ?

But this group as a consortium is the best means to provide support and combat any negative sentiment that may be out there.

An active group of commited members is always worth more than a page of signatures captured at your local supermarket.

Great work guys (trailcare) i respect the efforts and contribution you provide to our cause.

D

Simon's picture

However we need more members, heaps to do and not enough people. Membership is a bit over 100.

We are now at an exciting time and have the ear of all three Councils and all Land Managers at Red Hill and Oxy! The TrailCare brand is self explanatory and is now well known by government and builds from all the earlier work we did through NobMob and via clubs.

The single biggest constraint now holding back formal trails including gravity and DJ is us riders. Not enough hours in the day.

Our intention is to provide the contacts in the community, local and state government and also professional guidance to help everyone help themselves in a coordinated effort.

Among other things we also need help in promoting TrailCare, it's a balancing act of driving membership vs. a few fire fights and longer term planning and route options assessments, networking etc...

Please join up and drop me an email [email protected] with ideas or if you are eager to help

Hop fiend's picture

brilliant words!

danielschipper's picture

How do we get more involved? I'm sure there many of us willing to put some hours in but we don't know how.

Simon's picture

Hi Daniel

I'm currently preparing a task list which when posted it would be great for people to put their hands up.

This was based on feedback to date plus our ongoing projects.

This will be emailed to members and also posted here and other forums. For a number of reasons though we need you to be members to work on the tasks.

This last weeks events however delayed me getting it finished. A few of us have lost a few mornings and evenings after the MD and PL articles.

Simon's picture

All

I'm noticing a few comments that are not constructive to the overall riding cause.

Whatever discipline we are all in this together.

When I started this 4 years ago I rode 80% DH or FR. So did a very large proportion of other contributers.

Many may also be surprised to know that the document that has opened the door for discussion with all land managers at RH and Oxy for all disciplines was written by TrailCares freeriders and dirt jumpers.

We knew full well we were unlikely to get DH in NP's, which is what many of us rode, but knew that by swinging NPWS as far as we could everyone would benefit when we consider the doors this policy change opens up on less sensitive land tenures.

FR/DH and DJ is also aJt the cutting edge in terms of challenging the state of art sustainable track design and construction. The FR and DJ lawyers are also working hard to resolve risk and liability concerns. What these guys are doing benefits us all so please remain united.

danielschipper's picture

I'm a paid up member since Friday so looking forward to understanding how I can get involved to help the cause.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Best Mountain Bike