You are hereForums / By Discipline / Mountain (off road) / MTB Gear / Rear shock size.
Rear shock size.
NB: Originally posted elsewhere on the Global Riders Network and appears via syndication.
Pretty close to ordering new fork and shock, as per previous posts.
One thing Id like to get some more advice on is rear shock size for 2012 Trance adv 1
Currently the factory shock is a Fox 7.250 x 1.750 XV (high volume)
The 'boost valve' model i want only comes in 7.5 x 2.0 (both high and std volume)
From what iv'e read on MTBR etc, it seems its fine to run this. The biggest concern they have is raising the rear and slightly changing the head angle. Not a problem either way as the difference is so slight, you can set extra sag, and in my case i'll be running longer forks which will offset this.
Anyway, advice is always appreciated.
Thanks.
- Login to post comments
- Bookmark & share
Tags
Assuming the rear suspension allows for additional wiggle room above the norm, it shouldn't be a problem fitting the shock - e.g. single pivot, some four-bars and faux-bars. Suggest you look at the rear triangle of your bike (Trance, was it?) with the shock removed and see if you can continue to pivot the wheel downwards to give the shock another .25 inches to fit. Whether or not your added .25inches in STROKE will affect your ride is a different matter, because increasing your sag also makes it easier to bottom-out, unless you also fix your bottom-out settings too. That might in turn make it squishier for the first part of the compression yet quite hard when you get closer to the bottom of the stroke. But I suspect you've already seen the thread on mtbr forums on this.
Also remember that going against specifications set in the manual may make any warranty claims difficult.
Thanks.
To summarise my previous threads....
I'm 65kg, nothing special in the skills department, but i find even at 250psi, (almost no sag, and way higher pressure than suggested for my weight) i'm regularly bottoming out the rear shock. Front too, but thats another story.
The 2013 model that does come in a 7.250 x 1.750 is not a 'complete' upgrade. Sure its got kashima and CTD settings, but in that size it doesn't come in an XV (high volume) version, and doesn't have the boost valve. No point when half of it is a downgrade.
If you are bottoming out with high PSI and low sag weighting 65Kg, a high volume can will only make matters worse.
It is really weird that you are managing to bottom out like that so maybe checking out your current shock might be the best course of action. If all is right with the shock, what I doubt, you should take a look at shims to decrease the volume in the air chamber (Fox sell them) to make it ramp up more at the end of the stroke and resist bottom out.
Cheers
^^^^ what he said. XV cans are designed to allow you to make the shock very firm at the start for pedalling efficiency but still use the full stroke on bigger hits... exactly what you don't like, it seems. I think a return to a normal shock air can volume might fix your problem. 250psi for a 65kg rider seems high. I have a normal volume on my Rize and run at 215-220psi for an 85kg riding weight (ie with hydration pack shoes and scone guard )
I'll third that. An LV shock will give a less progressive compression curve so will be more likely
To bottom out for the same given pressure.
What would you like to achieve from the new rear shock?
All the best. T
Thanks for the info. I was thinking something along those lines, but i guess since the stock shock is high volume, id stick with that.
Firstly im assuming something isnt quite right with this shock. Testing other similar models at lower pressures seems to give a totally different feel. Their shocks have much greater difference between the hard and soft settings. Even though they are heavier riders, run lower pressures they still don't bottom out. Riding speeds/styles are similar.
From what ive read about the replacement i want, the 'differences between the 3 settings are quite large.
So heres my logic... I'll probably run it at higher pressure as usual. This will make the 'climb' setting nice and firm. On rough terrain with no jumps I can run the 'descend' setting, and when the landings are going to be big, probably the trail setting. I guess with 3 settings rather than 2 I'll have more tuning options while riding.
Once the new one arrives, I'll definitely be sending the old one back and get it looked at since its still well under warranty. Why don't i just do that now? Because the bike shop quotes me some stupid time to get it back.
Once its been looked at I can feel confident selling it.
Do this mod first, should give you exactly the response you want. Worked on my Giant Reign.
http://forums.mtbr.com/turner/dw-5-spot-rp23-mod...
gods, that's brilliant! I'm trying it.
Good shit for sure.
I'll try that this arvo. May not get a test ride for another week tho.
Failing that, it does look like changing to a low volume can (also only available in the larger 7.5 x 2.0 size) would be the way to go.
The mod appears to reduce the final air volume at the end of the stroke. This works, mate did the same and is also a trick used on open bath coil forks by changing the oil levels.
Just curious about the bottoming out. Are you landing with your weight back with the rear wheel hitting the ground first? Good on a hardtail to flat but not dual suspension.
I can bottom my 6" bike off a gutter by doing this or land 6 foot to flat without bottoming out by landing correctly front wheel first.
Landing too heavily back wheel first can prevent the fork from doing much as the head angle gets much slacker as you blow through your rear travel and the front hardly compresses, instead it try's to bend the fork. On a big slack bike this can bust your fork.
Front wheel first allows both the front and rear suspension to absorb the landing. I was taught to try and half compress the fork before landing the rear on a 6" bike.
Another question is do you have the shock rebound damping too slow? Over rubble and a quick sequence of bumps the shock will get stuck down because it can't extend fast enough meaning you run out of travel.
Thanks for that Simon.
This whole suspension saga started because i was bottoming out the front (Fox 32 120mm) at higher pressures. Even managed to force some oil past the seals, but that was a messed up landing. Figured if i was replacing the front i may as well do the rear.
To answer some questions:
-Rear rebound is usually fully open/fast. Sometimes add 3-4 clicks, but it seems when I flick the pro pedal i inadvertently open the rebound.
-I usually do land rear first. Maybe not by much, but still.
I guess the next question is "where can I learn how to ride?"
Are there any books, dvd's etc? Something i can do at my own pace before I go to riding school?
Only got a dualy 6 months ago, before that i was just doing the rail trail/munda biddi. Had no idea I should be landing front first. Maybe i stay away from that to avoid my favourite trick. Going over the handlebars
Anyway, spent ~5 hours working on the bike after work. Trying to get the Widget and chain tensioner working properly. Gave up and started on the rear shock. The best plastic I had ended up being too brittle, brought the air sleeve to work so i can hunt around for plastics.
I err on the slow side for rebound on the rear so that it's less likely to punt me off the front over waterbar lips and after landings. Can't remember how many clicks off fully damped I run it, but it's further towards fully damped than fully open.
Doesn't surprise me to hear you're going OTB a bit if you are running rebound fully open
On the front I err on the fast side so that it doesn't pack down on consecutive fast hits, for the same reason. It also helps keep the front tyre in contact with the dirt better by letting it drop into the depressions instead of hanging up in the air.
They are tips I picked up from UK Dirt Magazine's downhill skills vid "Fundamentals" (circa 2004 or thereabouts). How far you take that will depend on your local terrain and the size of the drops. Bigger = more rebound damping.
Riding a mates bike (jacojoco) a little while ago I almost went over the front because I was totally not expecting the kick from the rear off the water bar lip. Only just managed to stop the bike rotating too far in the air , so the rebound setting does make a big difference. Needless to say I thrust the bike out in front a lot harder off the next jump!
Hope this helps. These are my two cents. Interested to hear others' thoughts.
I run my rear Fox 4-5 clicks from slowest setting, then just set the front so that when you bounce up and down on the bike in the neutral position both ends return at the same rate. Same for air pressure, set the rear then get the front using the same travel when you bounce. Until I did this I was only ever using 4 inches of my 6 inch travel when following the weight rule for air pressure on the front.
The best book in my opinion is Mastering Mountain Bike Skills by Brian Lopez and Lee McCormack.
Basically covers everything. The writing style can be a bit annoying.
When it comes to drops it says fast drops to downhill land front first or slow to flat rear first. For small drops rear first can be okay as long as you do what it says and crouch and push the back down to reduce the drop height. They do show a dually for the first eg and a hard tail in the second.
For bigger drops to flat a mate taught me as I said before front first on a dually. He was a freak on a bike from NZ, sponsored by Specialized in DH and FR. This always gave me the softest and quietest landing.
Front first in each case means taking off with the bike level and once the back wheel has left the ground and airbourne slightly pushing the front down to land.
Never try and land until the back wheel is airbourne otherwise you will go over the bars.
Your rebound also is too fast. The fastest the back should be is the same as the front. This means if you are bunny hopping on the sport in a neutral position both wheels should lift off equally. Preferably the back end should be slightly slower than the front otherwise OTB's is more likely.
On a jump if you keep getting kicked by the back end it normally means you didn't compress the suspension going into the jump meaning the bike thought you went over a bump, tried to absorb it with the front and then the back and then sprung back front wheel and then back wheel. If you precompress the suspension into the jump the bike will boost into the air in control as the suspension doesn't soak it up.
Thanks heaps Simon.
Bought the book on iTunes today, and i don't think I'll be the only one.
Lots of info in your post to try. I guess the one thing ive half been doing right is compressing the suspension before a jump, or drop or pretty much anything i think i can get some air off. Its why I have the rebound fast, to give me some more spring and height. Definitely going to try landing how you said.
Also, finished installing the shim last night, reduced the pressure from 250 to 200 psi. Good chance ill still be in Perth this arvo so I'll test it out.
How did the shim mod work out for you?
Not great. Ended up bottoming out just as much at 200psi, so had to go back up to 250, and would still bottom out at least once a ride. While I agree you should be using all your travel once or twice per ride, doing so with a shimmed shock running 100psi over the recommended is not good.
Anyway, I figured it was a combination of shock, suspension design and rider. Buying new shocks/forks was just throwing good money after bad so i figured id look into a new bike.
Test rode a similar bike to what I'm getting. It had 20mm more travel (140 vs 120), and a newer non-CTD fox shock. Ran it at the recommended ~150psi, and intentionally hit everything as hard as I could. Didn't bottom out once, and small bump compliance was much better. So thats where i am. Just waiting for my frame and a few bits to arrive and the build can start
Its funny looking at my post above. After a post-ride clean and inspection yesterday i discovered i'd been running my rear shock for who knows how long on full fast rebound. Explains a few recent goofy offs and scaring myself off a couple of waterbars on the weekend :rolls eyes:
@Mez:
Glad you got something that works for you. Another thought is a skills class or two. The instructors can give you some guidance on suspension setup, and usually do at the start of the class. Will also help on learning how to handle drops and landings and help you replace any bad habits with better ones. I still do the drills I learned for a bit of fun and to help core strength and low speed bike handling.
I have a HV Boost Valve RP23 on my Heckler (8.5 X 2.5, Fox's biggest version) and I used to bottom that easy even way above recommended settings. (recommended 165psi - actual running at 210psi). I weigh 75kgs.
I purchased the Fox Float Air-Volume Spacer kit. Does exactly what that plastic shim mod is supposed to do, comes with three different sized volume reducers, easy to install.
I am using the large volume reducer in it right now. I can now run my shock at 170psi without blowing through the travel regularly. Will bottom a few times a ride but this is only from hard riding & landing jumps without much finesse. (I hit nearly all the jumps & drops I can find) The shock feels heaps better overall now.
http://www.pinkbike.com/news/tech-tuesday-How-to...
Something I found interesting to try is to leave your shock pump connected and try to compress the rear suspension and see just how fast the air pressure rises for not much travel.
Not that this helps anyone here but it's an interesting experiment.
It's also the fastest way to kill the gauge on the shock pump.
Yeah - I make sure to bash the needle against the stop as hard as I can while I'm doing it.
Just because you know its dangerous doesn't mean everyone else who wants to try your useless experiment knows too.
Oops - started a flame war.
HAhahahaha.
Thread turns awesome.
Just pointing out that if you decide to learn basic pneumatic principles using your shock pump, be careful.
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/pneumatic-cyli...
The force exerted by a single acting pneumatic cylinder can be expressed as
F = p A
= p π d2/4 (1)
where
F = force exerted (N)
p = gauge pressure (N/m2, Pa)
A = full bore area (m2)
d = full bore piston diameter (m)
What does it all mean?
It means the internet makes it easy to cut and paste engineering info which has no relevance to the topic. Gives us all something to ponder on our next downhill run anyway.
ROFL.
Yeah, completely useless.
I think somehow we are supposed to work out many newtons will be applied to the shock pump internals if we apply extra pressure to the shock while it is connected. Therefore demonstrating the destructive forces of compressing your shock while the pump is connected.
Who gives a fuck.
You mean, like, what's that noise coming from my back wheel?
Stupid sticks!
Nooooooo, it's my shock pump!