You are hereForums / General Discussion / Site topics / Maps on NoBMoB

Maps on NoBMoB


Duncan's picture

By Duncan - Posted on 12 February 2009

Not sure if this has been raised before but I think that it is a bit disrespectful to publish maps of illegal trails such as Oxford Falls on a site that is supposed to be pro MTB.
A lot of the local riders put in a huge amount of work building & maintaining these trails & the flood of newbies wanting to try out the trail in my view is going to get it shut down sooner rather than later.
It is pretty much common practice throughout the MTB community not to discuss the location of illegal trails and it seems wrong to advertise them on this site
The local residents suffer a great deal with increasing numbers using "hucksford" which is even worse while new people learn the acceptable behavour.
I apreciate that these maps have been on the site for quite some time however in my view it would be great if these maps could be removed from the site.
Thank you

ar_junkie's picture
It is pretty much common practice throughout the MTB community not to discuss the location of illegal trails

Are you saying that as long as you are in the know, then it's ok?

Buck's picture

Make sure you have your flame suit on before starting a discussion on this.

I don't see how its OK to build, and ride illegal trails as long as you keep it secret (not that OF is secret by a long shot)

Rob's picture

We've had this discussion before. You've been a member of this site for a while so surely you know this. Perhaps you're trying to wind someone up but people round here are pretty thick skinned so you'll have to try harder if that is your aim. Giving you the benefit of the doubt that isn't your motive - I have to ask, what then is your point?

It sounds like you want to be able to continue to build illegal trails in peace. It sounds like you think these trails, built on illegal sites belong to the person who built them and you don't want their location published so as not to have to share them with 'newbies' as you call them. It sounds like you don't want the public educating on the legal status of trails they will find in the bush. It therefore sounds like you're a very selfish individual who doesn't want others to enjoy the sport as you do.

Would that be a fair assessment? Please enlighten us if I've interpreted this incorrectly.

Why don't you campaign to get legal access to land and get legal trails built? That way a proper works schedule can be drawn up, like they have at Manly Dam and many state forests (Awaba, Ourimbah, Wingello, etc). That way many more people can help build trails, and as they say, many hands make light work. More importantly, that way many more people can enjoy them and 'newbies' can be introduced to the great sport of MTB riding without having to be told they have to break the law in order to experience the best trails out there.

ar_junkie's picture

The thread won't go that way i.e. someone starts a discussion and gets flamed because ppl don't necessarily agree.

Most of the Northern Beaches trails have been 'public' for quite some time. A book was published (in '03 I think) and sold at most LBS... The fact that there are more and more ppl riding these days, trails being closed & land being lost to development - 'secret' trails are bound to be discovered.

I'm just interested why/how ppl can think that it's ok to build illegal trails then complain when others find out about them and then talk about codes or ethics...

Little-Ditty's picture

It's a bit like the bank robber that runs out of the bank, gets rolled by some by-stander on the way to his getaway car, then complains to the cops "Hey, that guy stole my money!" Nice try sunshine.

sensai_miagi's picture

I'm not taking sides here...but Duncan does have a point...why are maps of illegal trails on here Rob?

Damien's picture

I believe the goal of this site is to promote mountainbiking in general so sharing knowledge of trails wether they be legal or illegal is going to be par for the course. The more people out there riding the better so lets see more maps because the mountain biking needs a bigger profile to get more acceptance amongst the wider community.

Oh yea and you can stick your common practice local's only secretive trails attitude up your derailleur.

Flynny's picture

"A book was published (in '03 I think) and sold at most LBS..."

there was also a video out in '09-2000 (?) which detailed a few trails around your way.

Nick R's picture

clearly states that several of the marked tracks (XC circuit, deep creek, etc) are illegal and links to the page that shows which ones and why they were "closed" by NPWS last year after the maps had already been in existence for awhile. Other tracks in the Oxford Falls map page are quite legal so I guess Rob could remove the offending ones from the maps if there was a compelling reason but what's the point when most users to this site can read for themselves which ones are off limits.

Duncan's picture

Just scrambled into the flame suit.
I wasn't aware that this had been done. What happen to the last culprit?. lol
It's not that illegal trails shouldn't be shared but do we really need to advertise them??. It's just that the sheer volume of riders is what gets them closed down. Understanding this sites such as farkin vertually forbid the disclosure of illegal trail locations.
Each time the local residents at O.F get sick of the ever increasing numbers of riders & decide to clean the place out they destroy thousands of hours of work and plenty of $ put in by local builders so I guess that it is disrespectful to hasten that destruction.
Maybe someone can tell me how advertising directions to your local track benefits the members of NOBMOB.
And Yes I do heaps of campaining for legal trails however in the mean time would like to keep access to the local illegal trails.
Cheers

Rob's picture
It's just that the sheer volume of riders is what gets them closed down.

Erm... no. The fact that they are illegal is what gets them closed down.

Or are you telling me that NPWS don't mind a few (define 'a few') riders in and around these trails? 'cos if that's the case lets start up a rota - everyone who's name begins 'A' may ride 1st of the month, 'B' on the 2nd and so on. Last few days of each month no-one rides as it's rehabilitation time.

[ Disclaimer for the stupid - the above paragraph is a joke! ]

This conversation is going to go no-where fast, because there's a fundamental difference in views here. Duncan here believes it's OK for him to break the law, but he doesn't want anyone else to because that will mean he's more likely to get caught. That's OK, Duncan, no worries. And I suppose we keep on paying for our groceries so the shops don't notice you stealing a few here and there? Or perhaps you want us to buy CDs and DVDs to keep the studios in business supplying you with illegal downloads? Hmmmm... wonder what would happen if everyone thought the way you do?

Maybe someone can tell me how advertising directions to your local track benefits the members of NOBMOB.

If you read my letter to Carmel Tebbutt you'll see why NoBMoB came about. This site isn't for the benefit of members (although the more you use it, the more you'll benefit), it's more for the benefit of the cycling community as a whole. Before we came along there were not decent online maps, and hopefully now there are. That is the point. We do note when trails are illegal and when they are not (to the best of our ability). If you choose to ride illegal trails knowing that they are then more fool you - but don't say you didn't know, because we pointed it out.

hairylittlehobbit's picture

Duncan your an idiot!

Paul's picture

I like the fact that the site maps show where the illegal trails are, because now I know where I am not supposed to ride. Actually now everybody knows where they are not allowed to ride - no excuses.

The people who ride illegal trails would probably like them removed to either ease their conscience or too keep them secret so they don't become too popular and draw attention.

I prefer them to stay so I have knowledge of where I can and can't ride.

Duncan's picture

The only people stealing anything are the people you are inviting to ride trails that don't contribute anything to there up keep.
If you want to use the CD analogy you are actually the pirate that is exploiting the hard work of all the people that contribute to the development of the track.
If illegal trails are so evil why are you promoting them?
It's obvious that you don't ride at oxford Falls & don't really care for the opinions of people that do so i think that I will leave it at that.
Happy riding

sensai_miagi's picture

Sorry to labour the point because i think i'm with you anyway and this website is A+, but why do you include maps of illegal trails on here? I'm just curious as to your reasons, sorry if i've missed it (maybe it's what Paul said). Do you really think it reduces the number of people riding there or increases it?

Flynny's picture

Were used for National Champs in 86... Part of the NP submission was the quality of the MTB trails so they have hardly been secret for the last 22 years... Ironic then that a few of them became illegal when the Park was approved.

But I do agree the prevallance of mornons hooning up the road and making pricks of themselves need the houses is a problem and only becomes more of a problem when trail locations are freely available.

"secretive" trails do tend to weed out the idiots.

Rob's picture

Yes, you are correct when you say riding on a trail and contributing nothing to it's upkeep isn't good. Well - perhaps you don't have to contribute to the upkeep of that particular trail, but if you ride you should perform trail maintenance when you can - what goes around and all that. That's why we have maintenance days in our calendar and why I attend them.

I'd hardly call a sentence ending "... please do not ride:" promotion.

I care deeply about Oxford Falls and want to see trails there opened up legally - it was one of my favourite places to ride.

Rob's picture

markterei - what Paul said. And what I said.

phantom's picture

MWMTB is holding a clean up Australia Day site at Oxford Falls on 1st March. It's to show thew local residents that we do care. Everyone should sign up and help while we can still ride this site. Who knows it might even open a few doors. Further info to follow www.mwmtb.com

QuikStep's picture

If the trails at oxford falls are worth this much discussion its time I went and had a ride, thanks for the tip Duncan

PIVOT MACH 5's picture

Rob, correct me if im mistaken but my interpretation when i look at maps of illegal trails is so i know where i cannot go and therefore have no risk of getting fined and my precious expensive bike confiscated. does that sum it up or is duncan actually smarter than he sounds?

Boulder's picture

just because they are new to the site it does not mean they are newbies. but even if they are newbies to riding, people know their boundries and if they look at the map and the pictures they will think "theres no way i can do that so i wont" and once they are good enough they will no all the ettiquet and know how to treat and respect tracks and riders.

So, first of all, there should be no newbies on the track and second of all, the riders that are experienced enough to do to do it will notdamage it or let it be uncovered by authorities.

Noel's picture

This is my opinion, its raining so I made a rant:

Hidden trails are a romantic, immature and naive way to build trails. Whether it's a set of jumps, a DH line or a XC loop, the concept involves many separate unrelated small groups of people building separate very small trails in isolation. These mini environmental disasters are typically ridden by a few and are typically not maintained for even the mid term. Jump parks are a prime example. I can think of about 6 sets of jumps in a 2km radius of my house (Thornleigh) that are in some form of decay. Each was built by a completely separate cluster of about 3-5 'kids' who have moved on and left their piles of eroding jumps, pits and berms as a message to all that come across them them that "Cyclists do this to the bush". Instead it is better if those 4x6 groups of builders (hypothetically 24) did it legally and built a set of jumps in prominent public view that attracted another 24-50 people and they ended up with a mecca to their sport that was legal and used by far far FAR more.

Actually believing that their trail is hidden is complete ignorance. Even though signs/etiquette say "Keep to Tracks", council, NPWS, bushcare, greenies, flora and fauna study and other people are all tramping and bush-bashing off formal trails in their day to day activities, stumbling on these things all the time.

The shift from hidden trails to legal high visible trails is the way to go. 'Underground' sports/activities may lose their romantic feel when comercialised and popularised beyond the 'cool' clique stage, but the participation rates, public backing, and thus funding far surpasses any problems with load due to extra use and the problems associated with managing the varying skill levels etc.

Now people who ride Manly Dam may not agree so much with this as the erosion from load has resulted in construction of wheel chair friendly remediation sections. There are other ways, it is not load that is to blame, it is the original design, and it is the form of action take to correct the drainage symptom. Additionally, we probably all agree that the provision of more trail would spread the load. The message here is to cater for the load, don't blame it. The load is an indication of local demand.

The focus MUST be on applying resources (including trail building time, sweat and efforts) into LEGAL trails. In the mission of getting legal single track in Horsnby Shire we are going to have to offer to remediate the various little disasters our jumping buddies, FR and DH buddies left us. The damage done to the relationship between MTB'ers and other interest groups (inlcudng bushcare volunteers) will one day be healed.

Join the campaign for legal single track in Northern Sydney, register with HSMBA.

http://hsmba.info/

Duncan's picture

Counter rant.
Great to see such a well thought out post with some logical argument however the question was not so much about trail secrecy but more do we really need to advertise illegal trails on this site. (The introduction to Oxford Falls reads like a tourist brochure)
The other thing that stands out is that like most of the opinions on this site it has been written as seen through the eyes of an XC rider.
For example to say that a set of dirt jumps is a mini environmental disaster is probably not accurate as it would have about the same environmental impact as a large skate park & far less than football field or a golf course. As found with the "fight for the Grove dirt jumps" dirt jumpers are just as deserving of a place to do their thing as anyone else in the community and the council will be rebuilding these previously illegal jumps just the way they were. The XC discipline on the other hand requires access to such large areas of land that it will always need to used borrowed land and be much more sensitive to environmental & land manager concerns. As such XC riders are continually working with land managers and copping flack for all the "illegal" trials done by there DH, Freeride & DJ counterparts.
DH riders are in a slightly different boat as they required less land than XC but at present probably too much to get their hands on a fully fledged sporting facility.
Freeriding (after all Oxford is more of a freeride park (not DH))
A few thoughts about freeriding.
1. There are currently no legal freeride parks in Australia so when XC riders who have an abundance of legal tracks (& still ride on illegal ones) complain about our illegal trails it’s just like rubbing salt into the wounds.
2. Most successful trail lobbying is done by clubs however there is no freeride competition in Australia which a club would most likely need to take on the fight and the majority of freeriders don’t really want to compete anyway. They just want to freeride. Furthermore the man made structures give the appearance of being very dangerous which would add to the already heavy insurance burden for the DH community.
3. Freeriding has as much in common with skate park & DJ as it does with DH however many freeriders like myself also race DH. Unlike XC & DH which can co-exist with NPWS & State forests etc. freeriding in my opinion requires a smaller foot print & a dedicated facility like Skate Park & DJ. (good luck with that hey)
4. Being an extreme sport, freeriding (& DH to a lesser extent) has the largest population of young people so it is easy to point out where mistakes by individuals are made (like building jumps out of milk crates behind your local shops)
No answers in the above I know
After spending most of my 45 years racing road & track & witnessing people looking down MTB as a lesser sport I now find that it is probably more prevalent within the MTB community itself.
The point I want to make (you knew I would eventually get to it) To the outsider we are all just mountain bikers and without a lot more understanding & respect between the codes I think that we will end up doing each other more harm than good.
That is why I am of the view that the opposition to the removal of the advertising of Oxford Falls on this site was based on prejudice and disrespect of the DH freeride codes and not any sound logic.
Cheers

delicious's picture

There seems to be some confusion here. At least I'm experiencing a little...
An illegal trail is rather different to an illegally constructed freeride aparatus. Quite often the aparatus will appear ( somewhat magically ) within a perfectly acceptable trail network. At present, and to my best knowledge, there is no such thing as a legal ramp, jump, double jump, table top or drop-off. The liability for the land owner is just too great. The concept of it being loads of fun to ride is all too often missed by those in power. And it's largely irrelevant, because it's no fun being sued when/if a rider stacks and/or the aparatus collapses. And they do collapse. Nothing can last forever, especially when built cheaply, in haste and in secret.
As far as I can tell, NOBMOB doesn't sanction the use of presently illegal trails. A few trails get their status changed from legal to illegal, and I notice that Rob is swift in pointing this out to us all. But Rob is here to provide us with this site, not hold our hand. Individuals need to satisfy themselves that where they choose to ride is acceptable.
Also, as is the nature of the wonderful state that is NSW, there are many grey areas. The revelation of good trails by NOBMOB people at a location were it's hard to obtain information relating to it's status is hardly cause for this site to be accused of endorsing illegal activity. Once again, individuals need to obtain their own information.
Illegally constructions within an otherwise acceptable trail network aren't actually revealed here. Photos may appear yet the exact location is still vague. Building them is illegal, riding them isn't. Those riding them do so at their own risk, in the same fashion a rider attempts a naturally occuring drop or obstacle.
So, in an effort to respond to those who believe that NOBMOB is deliberately encouraging the mtb public to ride trails that have been closed by NPWS or other forces, or to ride trails that have never been available to begin with, then I say this;
BULLSHIT.
NOBMOB is a social site which offers maps of perfectly legal trails which may or may not include trails that have since been closed, which may or may not include illegally built freeride type constructions and jumps, and may lead readers to locations where the trails legality is unknown and the onus is on the individual to source accurate details on it's ride status.
NOBMOB is a also a site where people can meet to race socially and/or competetively in a professionally managed event which can feature trails which are usually closed to riders. These routes often appear on NOBMOB maps, yet once again the route status is made clear.
There you have it. Pretty damn clear I reckon.

Rob's picture

Thanks to Delicious for pointing out the (maybe non-too?) obvious.

There is a footer on every page on this site. It points the reader to our disclaimer which says a few things but ends up with in bold type:

You are responsible for your own actions at all times, don't blame us!

This is the internet after all, and anyone can write on this site. Yes, Duncan, maybe it is a little XC orientated but that's because the people who actually get off their butt to write happen to be that way inclined - write some (constructive & legal) trail reports of your own if you have more to add!.

Anyhow, the internet - don't believe everything you read or see there. Like, durh! Sticking out tongue

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Best Mountain Bike